Skip to content

Platform

One layer behind every facility decision.

Risk scoring, spending plans, digital twins, and reporting. Connected to your CMMS data so your team trades the spreadsheets for a plan finance can defend.

Each layer does one job. The value is in how they connect.

Risk drives spending. Reporting explains the call. The twin adds physical context. Start with the layer that answers the question in front of you.

RISK ENGINE

Find the assets that carry the most concentrated risk.

We combine age, weather, maintenance, and dependencies into one score, so your team sees what deserves urgency before failure makes the call.

Age, service gaps, and weather exposure combined into one score
Dependency mapping shows cascading failure risk
Dollar-denominated exposure for capital conversations
Deep dive: Risk Engine
Risk dashboard output
3 critical
Carrier Chiller CH-01
82/100
$412K exp.
Backup Generator G-03
71/100
$218K exp.
AHU-4 Central Campus
58/100
$95K exp.
Top action signal

Replacing CH-01 now would eliminate the largest share of modeled portfolio exposure before Q3 peak load.

Facilities Risk Summary
Board export ready
1
Central Plant chiller replacement
Before Q3
Urgent
2
Generator testing — storm season
Next 30 days
High
3
Deferred HVAC cluster — Bldg C
FY budget
Plan
Executive summary

Portfolio carries $725K in modeled risk exposure. Three targeted interventions would reduce it by 78%.

REPORTING

Turn analysis into a leadership-ready narrative.

Board-facing dashboards and exports help finance, facilities, and executives align on the same ranked decision story.

Ranked risk priorities with clear urgency and consequence framing
One-click PDF for board or finance review
Finance and facilities see the same data — different views
Deep dive: Reporting
CAPITAL PLANNING

Compare defer, replace, and monitor paths before budget lock.

Scenario modeling and ranked priorities help teams defend capital timing with a clearer cost and consequence case.

Side-by-side scenario comparison with cost and risk trade-offs
Consequence modeling — what happens if you defer another year
Budget timing recommendations tied to risk trajectory
Deep dive: Capital Planning
Scenario comparison — CH-01 chiller
Replace nowRecommended
Eliminates peak load risk
$280K
82% risk cut
Monitor + repairModerate
Risk compounds next season
$45K/yr
20% risk cut
Defer 12 monthsHigh risk
$412K emergency exposure
$0 now
0% risk cut
Digital twin — Building 43D View
Central Plant
Chiller Room
HVAC Bank
Elec Room
Generator Bay
Storage
!
!
CH-01 Chiller — Risk score 82Central Plant
Generator G-03 — Risk score 71Generator Bay
DIGITAL TWIN

See the system and its context, not just the record.

3D facility views connect physical infrastructure to inspection, risk, and planning conversations when location and context matter.

Upload GLB files — your existing building models work
Risk markers overlay on the physical space
Click any zone to surface connected asset records and scores
Deep dive: Digital Twin

From fragmented data
to a decision leadership can act on.

The value is in the sequence: build the baseline, find concentrated risk, compare your options, then hand leadership a report they can actually use.

01
Build the baseline

Asset records, system context, and operating environment.

02
Surface concentrated risk

Separate noise from genuinely urgent infrastructure decisions.

03
Compare intervention paths

Test replace, defer, or monitor before committing budget.

04
Export the decision

Leadership gets a ranked narrative, not a pile of data.

The point is not more features.

01
Before

Static assessments and fragmented tools

After

A live risk, spending, and reporting layer that updates as conditions change

02
Before

Re-explaining the infrastructure case to leadership, meeting by meeting

After

One ranked story that carries the reasoning from risk to spending plan to board report

03
Before

Isolated urgency claims with little context

After

Compare replace, defer, and monitor in one workflow, before the budget locks

Three rooms. One plan that works in all of them.

Facilities teams

Go from backlog to ranked action.

Your team already knows what is aging. We help you show which systems deserve action first, and exactly why.

Finance

See infrastructure in budget language.

Projects get easier to compare when the frame is exposure, timing, and likely risk reduction. Not isolated urgency.

Leadership

A clearer risk story for the executive room.

Leadership gets a usable summary of where the risk sits and what the next defensible move is. No digging through technical detail.

See it through your own
facility questions.

We show the parts that matter most for your environment. Whether that starts with risk, the spending plan, reporting, or the digital twin.

Prefer to compare plans first? View pricing

Book a demo