Rivolq
Facility Intelligence
CMMS
Platform
Solutions
Pricing
Resources
Company
Case Studies

Real deployments. Real risk surfaced. Real decisions clarified.

Rivolq's first live deployment shows what buyers want proof of most: hidden risk becoming visible, capital priorities becoming defensible, and teams leaving with outputs they can actually use.

2
facilities
15
assets monitored
3
critical risks surfaced
90
day delivery path
University campus pilot facility
Risk dashboard from Rivolq pilot

Featured deployment

Pilot deployment: university campus

Across two facilities and fifteen monitored assets, Rivolq identified three concentrated risks the team did not know were interacting across HVAC, generator, and drainage systems.

What Rivolq Found

The value came from interaction effects.

None of these issues were invisible on their own. The difference was seeing how age, weather, maintenance, and dependencies changed the decision.

1

Risk 1

Aging chiller risk was understated

The system was operating beyond expected lifecycle, but the real exposure became clear only after condition, weather, and dependency context were modeled together.

2

Risk 2

Generator failure had a hidden dependency

Drainage and outage sequence risks made one storm-season failure materially more disruptive than the team had assumed from maintenance history alone.

3

Risk 3

Deferred maintenance was multiplying exposure

What looked like separate mechanical issues was actually a compounding pattern that changed replacement timing and capital priority order.

What The Team Received

Three outputs that moved the conversation forward.

The project did not end with a dashboard. It ended with a stronger decision package for operators, leadership, and funding conversations.

Executive risk summary

Executive risk summary

Leadership got a concise view of where the most urgent exposure sat and why the top interventions mattered now.

Capital recommendation stack

Capital recommendation stack

The facilities team received a ranked action list that tied each recommendation to exposure, timing, and likely risk reduction.

Scenario planning for next moves

Scenario planning for next moves

Decision-makers could compare replace-now, defer, and monitor paths instead of arguing from static condition notes alone.

Outcome

What changed after the pilot landed.

The point of the pilot was not novelty. It was to give the facilities team and leadership a clearer answer to what should happen next.

A clearer top-three intervention list before storm season

A stronger board narrative for capital timing and consequence

A shared view between operators and leadership on what required urgency

A reusable reporting format for future facility decisions

Want a similar outcome?

We can scope a first facility and show where the biggest risk sits.

If you want to turn a backlog of infrastructure questions into a ranked plan, the pilot is the fastest place to start.